0.06/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.11	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.10/0.32	% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
0.10/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.10/0.32	% WCLimit    : 240
0.10/0.32	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:32:49 EDT 2025
0.10/0.32	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.45	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.17/0.45	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RZWMelSRpP/E---3.1_32070.p
2.94/0.80	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
2.94/0.80	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
2.94/0.80	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
2.94/0.80	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 1200s (5) cores
2.94/0.80	# Starting sh2lt with 240s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 240s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# Starting post_as_ho10 with 240s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# post_as_ho5 with pid 32148 completed with status 0
2.94/0.80	# Result found by post_as_ho5
2.94/0.80	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
2.94/0.80	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
2.94/0.80	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 1200s (5) cores
2.94/0.80	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
2.94/0.80	# Search class: HGUNF-FFMF22-SHHFFMBN
2.94/0.80	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
2.94/0.80	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 649s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 121s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# Starting sh2l with 109s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# Starting lpo1_def_fix with 109s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 109s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# sh2l with pid 32156 completed with status 0
2.94/0.80	# Result found by sh2l
2.94/0.80	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNHHA.
2.94/0.80	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
2.94/0.80	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 1200s (5) cores
2.94/0.80	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,1.0,0,2,20000,1.0,true)
2.94/0.80	# Search class: HGUNF-FFMF22-SHHFFMBN
2.94/0.80	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
2.94/0.80	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 649s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# Starting post_as_ho5 with 121s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# Starting sh2l with 109s (1) cores
2.94/0.80	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
2.94/0.80	# Presaturation interreduction done
2.94/0.80	
2.94/0.80	# Proof found!
2.94/0.80	# SZS status Theorem
2.94/0.80	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
2.94/0.80	thf(decl_23, type, epred1_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
2.94/0.80	thf(decl_24, type, epred2_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
2.94/0.80	thf(decl_25, type, epred3_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
2.94/0.80	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i).
2.94/0.80	thf(decl_27, type, epred4_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
2.94/0.80	thf(decl_28, type, esk2_2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o) > $i).
2.94/0.80	thf(cTHM120C_pme, conjecture, ?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((![X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:((![X6:$i]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X5 @ X6)|(X2 @ X3 @ X5 @ X6)))<=(![X6:$i]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6)|(X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6)))&![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6)|(X1 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6))))))&![X3:$i > $o, X6:$i]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X3 @ X6)|(X1 @ X3 @ X3 @ X6))))&~(![X6:$i]:(((X1 @ (^[X7:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[X8:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|(X2 @ (^[X9:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[X10:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RZWMelSRpP/E---3.1_32070.p', cTHM120C_pme)).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((![X3:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o]:(((![X6:$i]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6)|(X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X6)))&![X6:$i]:(((X2 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6)|(X1 @ X4 @ X5 @ X6))))=>![X6:$i]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X5 @ X6)|(X2 @ X3 @ X5 @ X6)))))&![X3:$i > $o, X6:$i]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X3 @ X6)|(X1 @ X3 @ X3 @ X6))))&~(![X6:$i]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|(X2 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120C_pme])])])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X22:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X23:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X27:$i, X28:$i, X32:$i]:(((((~(X23 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X22 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X27)|(X23 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X27))|((X22 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X23 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)))&(~(X22 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X22 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X27)|(X23 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X27))|((X22 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X23 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32))))&((~(X23 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X23 @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X28)|(X22 @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X28))|((X22 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X23 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)))&(~(X22 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X23 @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X28)|(X22 @ (epred2_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ X28))|((X22 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X23 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)))))&(((~(X23 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|~(X22 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk1_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X22 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X23 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)))&(~(X22 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|~(X22 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk1_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X22 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X23 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32))))&((~(X23 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|~(X23 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk1_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X22 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X23 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)))&(~(X22 @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred4_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk2_2 @ X22 @ X23))|~(X23 @ (epred1_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (epred3_2 @ X22 @ X23) @ (esk1_2 @ X22 @ X23))|((X22 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32)|(X23 @ (^[Z0/* 1 */:$i]:($true)) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X32))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X6)|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X2 @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X7)|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X7)|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|(X2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|~((X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X2 @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7)|(X2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7)|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X2 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X7)|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 7 */:$i]:(~(($true)))) @ X7)|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X6:$i, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X6)|~((X1 @ (epred1_2 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1) @ (epred3_2 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1) @ (esk1_2 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1)))|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ X1))))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X6:$i, X7:$i]:((((epred3_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0))))=(epred2_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))))|((^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))))|(X1 @ (epred2_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))) @ (epred3_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_6])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X6:$i, X2:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X2 @ (epred1_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred2_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7)|(X2 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7)|~((X1 @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (epred4_2 @ X2 @ X1) @ (esk2_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (((^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))))|((epred2_2 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0))))!=(epred1_2 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(~($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])])])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o, X6:$i, X7:$i]:((((epred2_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0))))=(epred1_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))))|((^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))))|(X1 @ (epred1_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))) @ (epred2_2 @ X1 @ (^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:((Z0)))) @ X6)|(X1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true))) @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true))) @ X7))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_10])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ((^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(~($true)))=(^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(($true)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
2.94/0.80	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])]), ['proof']).
2.94/0.80	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
2.94/0.80	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
2.94/0.80	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
2.94/0.80	# Initial clauses                      : 8
2.94/0.80	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
2.94/0.80	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
2.94/0.80	# Processed clauses                    : 492
2.94/0.80	# ...of these trivial                  : 13
2.94/0.80	# ...subsumed                          : 114
2.94/0.80	# ...remaining for further processing  : 365
2.94/0.80	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 82
2.94/0.80	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
2.94/0.80	# Backward-subsumed                    : 89
2.94/0.80	# Backward-rewritten                   : 172
2.94/0.80	# Generated clauses                    : 2662
2.94/0.80	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2185
2.94/0.80	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
2.94/0.80	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
2.94/0.80	# Paramodulations                      : 2137
2.94/0.80	# Factorizations                       : 2
2.94/0.80	# NegExts                              : 61
2.94/0.80	# Equation resolutions                 : 82
2.94/0.80	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
2.94/0.80	# Total rewrite steps                  : 334
2.94/0.80	# ...of those cached                   : 313
2.94/0.80	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
2.94/0.80	#    Propositional check models        : 0
2.94/0.80	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
2.94/0.80	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
2.94/0.80	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
2.94/0.80	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
2.94/0.80	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
2.94/0.80	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
2.94/0.80	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
2.94/0.80	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
2.94/0.80	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
2.94/0.80	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
2.94/0.80	# Current number of processed clauses  : 51
2.94/0.80	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
2.94/0.80	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
2.94/0.80	#    Negative unit clauses             : 8
2.94/0.80	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 27
2.94/0.80	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1501
2.94/0.80	# ...number of literals in the above   : 6741
2.94/0.80	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
2.94/0.80	# Current number of archived clauses   : 314
2.94/0.80	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5252
2.94/0.80	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2555
2.94/0.80	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 146
2.94/0.80	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1050
2.94/0.80	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
2.94/0.80	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1693
2.94/0.80	# BW rewrite match successes           : 368
2.94/0.80	# Condensation attempts                : 0
2.94/0.80	# Condensation successes               : 0
2.94/0.80	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 677345
2.94/0.80	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 281
2.94/0.80	
2.94/0.80	# -------------------------------------------------
2.94/0.80	# User time                : 0.327 s
2.94/0.80	# System time              : 0.006 s
2.94/0.80	# Total time               : 0.333 s
2.94/0.80	# Maximum resident set size: 1872 pages
2.94/0.80	
2.94/0.80	# -------------------------------------------------
2.94/0.80	# User time                : 1.607 s
2.94/0.80	# System time              : 0.043 s
2.94/0.80	# Total time               : 1.650 s
2.94/0.80	# Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
2.94/0.80	% E exiting
2.94/0.80	% E exiting
2.94/0.80	EOF
